From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix the bug for missing field name before operator
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:52:51 -0400
Message-ID: <200808071652.51674.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <489ACF21.8080707@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <489ACF21.8080707@cn.fujitsu.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Thursday 07 August 2008 06:32:01 Zhang Xiliang wrote:
> I think the way "f == v" can't make sure that they didn't type -F =10.
> After "v = strstr(pair, "=")" and v++. The v will not equal to f.
>
> It is checked by "audit_name_to_field()", but not "f == v".
> Because before v++, the "*v" is set to 0. we can use "*f == 0" to check out
> the case. The patch is for it.

Applied. Thanks for the patch !

-Steve