From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:32:54 -0400 Message-ID: <200808121632.55341.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <0E43BF2D7491F0468B56B1A5C493866B020DD0F1@SAT4MX07.RACKSPACE.CORP> <48A1EB72.6070607@redhat.com> <1218571902.3540.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1218571902.3540.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Eric Paris Cc: William Kelly , linux-audit@redhat.com, Bret Piatt List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Tuesday 12 August 2008 16:11:42 Eric Paris wrote: > As soon as you grasp that article send me the code and we'll work > together to fix this problem! And any code created needs to be backwards compatible. you could have new user space/new kernel, or new user space/old kernel, and new kernel/old user space. You have no way of dictating which versions of anything people will use. -Steve