From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:46:03 -0400 Message-ID: <200808121846.04322.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <0E43BF2D7491F0468B56B1A5C493866B020DD0F1@SAT4MX07.RACKSPACE.CORP> <200808121753.10501.sgrubb@redhat.com> <48A20AA4.1020409@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <48A20AA4.1020409@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: John Dennis Cc: William Kelly , linux-audit@redhat.com, Bret Piatt List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Tuesday 12 August 2008 18:11:48 John Dennis wrote: > > With backwards compatibility you don't have to worry about having too= ls > > of that era. > > =C2=A0 > > This does not address the problem of matching a log file to a kernel > version=20 The kernel version is recorded in the daemon startup event. > nor unanticipated user space provided audit records.=20 The onus is with the developers to test their work. I did that for all th= e=20 audit records I added throughout user space. -Steve