From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PATH records show fcaps
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:52:40 -0400
Message-ID: <200810201852.40308.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1224343392.3189.74.camel@paris-laptop>
	<20081020163104.GA21901@us.ibm.com>
	<1224521741.3189.100.camel@paris-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1224521741.3189.100.camel@paris-laptop>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Monday 20 October 2008 12:55:41 Eric Paris wrote:
> > Steve's suggestion of cap_prm and cap_inh are good for being shorter =
and
> > matching proc output. =C2=A0But OTOH it's a bit confusing as at first=
 I
> > thought these were the task's values. =C2=A0Would it be too terse to =
just
> > use fP and fI?
>
> yes, too terse. How about cap_fP, cap_fI, cap_fVer, cap_fEffBit ?
>
> Based on your other comments I'm going to go add fVer and fEffBit.

We don't have any audit fields with mixed cases in the field name. Let's =
not=20
start it so that searches stay simple.

Thanks,
-Steve