From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PATH records show fcaps
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:21:06 -0400
Message-ID: <200810202221.06482.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1224343392.3189.74.camel@paris-laptop>
	<200810201852.40308.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<1224543619.3189.193.camel@paris-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1224543619.3189.193.camel@paris-laptop>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Monday 20 October 2008 19:00:19 Eric Paris wrote:
> so choices
>
> 1) cap_fP, cap_fE, cap_fI
> 2) cap_fp, cap_fe, cap_fi
> 3) capprm_file, capeff_file, capinh_file
>
> If steve feels strongly about not going down #1 (which obviously I
> liked!) I vote #2.....

Yes, #2 is fine.

Thanks,
-Steve