From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ausearch on aggregation - syscall difference
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:16:21 -0400
Message-ID: <200810241316.21804.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1224868121.9388.8.camel@homeserver>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Received: from vpn-12-78.rdu.redhat.com (vpn-12-78.rdu.redhat.com
	[10.11.12.78])
	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9OHGJIN020289
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:16:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1224868121.9388.8.camel@homeserver>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Friday 24 October 2008 13:08:41 LC Bruzenak wrote:
> Note that the syscall is listed differently.

Interesting.


> This is using the 1.7.7 code (on F9), I have not yet moved over to 1.7.8
> in case it may be fixed there.

Nope...nothing was changed there to fix it. This is the first I'd heard of the 
problem..Can you show me the raw record?

ausearch -ts today -a 10038 --raw

Thanks,
-Steve