From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/15] sanitize audit_ipc_obj()
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:32:45 +0000
Message-ID: <20081217093245.GC28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <E1LCoh0-00009T-Sd@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <alpine.LRH.1.10.0812171823430.22856@tundra.namei.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1759342AbYLQJdH@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0812171823430.22856@tundra.namei.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>, linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:24:40PM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > +		struct {
> > +			uid_t			uid;
> > +			gid_t			gid;
> > +			mode_t			mode;
> > +			u32			osid;
> > +		} ipc;
> 
> 'osid' should be converted into 'secid' someday.

Eh?  Do you mean the field name there or the actual output?  Either is
trivial, of course, but the latter is up to userland folks and the
former alone seems to be rather pointless...