From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: audit_pid with multiple userspace auditd processes
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:41:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901071741.20531.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231364199.31089.61.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 04:36:39 pm Eric Paris wrote:
> lets say userspace starts 2 copies of auditd.
# auditctl -s
AUDIT_STATUS: enabled=1 flag=1 pid=4488 rate_limit=0 backlog_limit=512 lost=1
backlog=0
# /sbin/auditd
# auditctl -s
AUDIT_STATUS: enabled=1 flag=1 pid=0 rate_limit=0 backlog_limit=512 lost=1
backlog=0
# ps -ef | grep auditd
root 580 2 0 08:19 ? 00:00:00 [kauditd]
root 4488 1 0 16:35 ? 00:00:00 auditd
root 5128 3654 0 17:33 pts/1 00:00:00 grep auditd
> Then they kill the first copy. The kernel at that point thinks there is no
> userspace auditd running and will instead send things to dmesg
Looks to me like the kernel is setting auditd_pid to 0 and the second auditd
does not start - at least with my current setup.
For some other setups, it probably overwrites the pid with the new one and
keeps going.
> We could fix it by changing the handling in audit_receive_msg to reject
> setting the audit_pid to 0 if the current audit_nlk_pid !=
> NETLINK_CB(skb).pid.
Well, what if the first crashed and the kernel didn't know it yet? It might be
better to forcibly break the connection to the original auditd.
> It's not a big deal, maybe we just call results of audit with multiple
> userspace auditd's running at the same time a undefined and not care.
What do you get for auditctl -s before and after starting your second auditd?
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 21:36 audit_pid with multiple userspace auditd processes Eric Paris
2009-01-07 22:04 ` Linda Knippers
2009-01-07 22:10 ` Eric Paris
2009-01-07 22:12 ` Linda Knippers
2009-01-07 22:41 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2009-01-07 22:54 ` Eric Paris
2009-01-07 23:07 ` Steve Grubb
2009-01-07 23:11 ` Linda Knippers
2009-01-07 23:24 ` Steve Grubb
2009-01-07 23:33 ` Linda Knippers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901071741.20531.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox