public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Do away with entry filter
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:18:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902271618.41139.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235765644.3386.64.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Friday 27 February 2009 03:14:04 pm Eric Paris wrote:
> > We still have user, task, and exclude filters. So we still need to be
> > able to specify them.
>
> right, so lets call them   user, task, exclude and SYSCALL rather than
> user, task, exclude and EXIT.

Precisely what I was trying to get at with Linda's comments. We still have to 
have the same rule format since you have to specify which filter the never or 
always goes with. And I would have to honor entry/exit inside auditctl for 
quite a while before dropping it there. But we should be careful about 
changing defines in the kernel.


> /me will very happily mark the old rule format, entry, and task lists
> for kernel removal.  Maybe around 2.6.31? .32? I could clean all the
> crap out.

Yes, I think we could give it a good cleaning out in the near future. I'd 
prefer having a patch soonish, but not submitted for a while so that distros 
can switch user space well before the kernel changes.

Additionally, I want to use the 2.0 release to clean out the legacy 
workarounds for defines at various points in the audit system's life.

-Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27 14:54 [RFC] Do away with entry filter Steve Grubb
2009-02-27 16:56 ` Linda Knippers
2009-02-27 17:40   ` Steve Grubb
2009-02-27 17:48     ` Linda Knippers
2009-02-27 18:19       ` Steve Grubb
2009-02-27 19:27         ` Linda Knippers
2009-02-27 20:14         ` Eric Paris
2009-02-27 21:18           ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2009-07-28 18:26 ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902271618.41139.sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox