From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: arch question in rules
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:34:36 -0400
Message-ID: <200904071434.36500.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1239120064.30677.21.camel@homeserver>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1239120064.30677.21.camel@homeserver>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tuesday 07 April 2009 12:01:04 pm LC Bruzenak wrote:
> Q: Should I remove the arch=b32 audit rules if all machines are 64-bit?
> Previously we had both; loaded same ruleset everywhere.

If you had a i386, you could drop the b64 rules. However, x86_64 has both 32 
and 64 bit syscalls. So you need both for full coverage.

-Steve