From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ausearch discrepancies?
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:53:26 -0400
Message-ID: <200906051153.27051.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1244162237.31664.477.camel@homeserver>
	<200906051132.35757.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<1244216538.31664.526.camel@homeserver>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1244216538.31664.526.camel@homeserver>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Friday 05 June 2009 11:42:18 am LC Bruzenak wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 11:32 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 June 2009 08:37:17 pm LC Bruzenak wrote:
> > > This shows plenty of events after the 19:11 event shown.
> > > Any ideas?
> >
> > Looks like a problem. FYI, using aureport shows the exact time range
> > selected for the search. (Aureport and ausearch share the same time
> > code.)
>
> Seems like it is operating true to the man page (earlier email).
> No?
> I do not agree with the behavior...but agree it is consisten

Well, I don't think assuming a time of now is the right thing to do for 
keywords that mean something in the past. It should be midnight for an ending 
time.

-Steve