From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: Reactive rules
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:23:02 +0100
Message-ID: <20100330222302.GK30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1003310009440.30178@laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1003310009440.30178@laptop>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Juraj Hlista <juro.hlista@gmail.com>
Cc: sgrubb@redhat.com, mitr@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:17:11AM +0200, Juraj Hlista wrote:
> From: Juraj Hlista <juro.hlista@gmail.com>
> 
> Add support for reactive rules. An audit rule can contain more than one reaction. The reactions are identified by numbers in the kernel and by strings in the user space.

Huh?  We already have a way to associate a unique key with a rule; what does
that patch offer that can't be happily handled by userland with what we
already have?