* aureport header question
@ 2010-03-25 23:13 LC Bruzenak
2010-03-26 1:49 ` LC Bruzenak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: LC Bruzenak @ 2010-03-25 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Audit
Steve (et. al.):
I still see the aureport error (below).
Has this been addressed in any patches in the V 2 audit release?
Good example:
[issm1@audit ~]$ sudo aureport -ts yesterday -i --summary
Summary Report
======================
Range of time in logs: 03/25/2010 00:01:02.160 - 03/25/2010 15:26:29.341
Selected time for report: 03/24/2010 00:00:00 - 03/25/2010 15:26:29.341
[issm1@audit ~]$ date
Thu Mar 25 16:10:11 UTC 2010
Bad example (note "Range of time in logs" line):
[issm1@audit ~]$ sudo aureport -ts yesterday -te 03/25/2010 00:00:00
-i --summary
Summary Report
======================
Range of time in logs: 01/01/1970 00:00:00.000 - 01/01/1970 00:00:00.000
Selected time for report: 03/24/2010 00:00:00 - 03/25/2010 00:00:00
Thx,
LCB.
--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: aureport header question
2010-03-25 23:13 aureport header question LC Bruzenak
@ 2010-03-26 1:49 ` LC Bruzenak
2010-03-26 2:35 ` LC Bruzenak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: LC Bruzenak @ 2010-03-26 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Audit
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:13 PM, LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com> wrote:
> Steve (et. al.):
>
> I still see the aureport error (below).
> Has this been addressed in any patches in the V 2 audit release?
>
Never mind; I see the issue. There are no events. Sorry for the bother.
LCB.
--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: aureport header question
2010-03-26 1:49 ` LC Bruzenak
@ 2010-03-26 2:35 ` LC Bruzenak
2010-03-31 14:32 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: LC Bruzenak @ 2010-03-26 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Audit
OK, let me try again.
1st summarize all in the dir (minor - time precision varies on report
time start/ends):
[root@audit tmp]# aureport -if audit-mirror/ -i --summary
Summary Report
======================
Range of time in logs: 03/23/2010 16:30:17.279 - 03/26/2010 01:58:02.255
Selected time for report: 03/23/2010 16:30:17 - 03/26/2010 01:58:02.255
...
2nd see events from yesterday through now (range of time in logs isn't
accurate as shown above; same files are there):
[root@audit tmp]# aureport -if audit-mirror/ -i --summary -ts
yesterday -te today
Summary Report
======================
Range of time in logs: 03/25/2010 00:01:01.519 - 03/26/2010 01:58:02.255
Selected time for report: 03/25/2010 00:00:00 - 03/26/2010 01:58:53
...
Now see the issue I was trying to illustrate earlier (ending time of
range in logs; there are definitely events there in that timeframe) :
[root@audit tmp]# aureport -if audit-mirror/ -i --summary -ts
yesterday -te 03/26/2010 00:00:00
Summary Report
======================
Range of time in logs: 03/25/2010 00:01:01.519 - 01/01/1970 00:00:00.000
Selected time for report: 03/25/2010 00:00:00 - 03/26/2010 00:00:00
Number of changes in configuration: 234
Number of changes to accounts, groups, or roles: 0
Number of logins: 7
Number of failed logins: 146
...
And this is the issue I was questioning.
Do you think it has been addressed already by possibly newer code than
I have (1.7.16)?
Thx,
LCB.
--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: aureport header question
2010-03-26 2:35 ` LC Bruzenak
@ 2010-03-31 14:32 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2010-03-31 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-audit
On Thursday 25 March 2010 10:35:57 pm LC Bruzenak wrote:
> Now see the issue I was trying to illustrate earlier (ending time of
> range in logs; there are definitely events there in that timeframe) :
> [root@audit tmp]# aureport -if audit-mirror/ -i --summary -ts
> yesterday -te 03/26/2010 00:00:00
aureport/search aborts processing an event if the parsing is wrong. There may
be some records with formats that do not match. You might try getting the logs
smaller and smaller until you get a few that reproduce the problem.
> And this is the issue I was questioning.
> Do you think it has been addressed already by possibly newer code than
> I have (1.7.16)?
1.7.17 is the latest. I don't think it addresses this issue.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-31 14:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-25 23:13 aureport header question LC Bruzenak
2010-03-26 1:49 ` LC Bruzenak
2010-03-26 2:35 ` LC Bruzenak
2010-03-31 14:32 ` Steve Grubb
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).