From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Which auditd for which kernel?
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:58:13 -0400
Message-ID: <201010251058.14207.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <C8EB005E.12CB%kkatzke@sentryds.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8EB005E.12CB%kkatzke@sentryds.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Karl Katzke <kkatzke@sentryds.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Monday, October 25, 2010 10:37:34 am Karl Katzke wrote:
> What=B9s the appropriate response?

You can use either 1.7.18 or 2.0.5 on a 2.6.25 kernel. However, note that t=
he =

audit code has been branched. The 1.7 branch is maintenance only, while act=
ive =

development and new features are on the 2.x branch.

> Step back to the 1.x arch of autid, although I note that the redhat build=
 is
> 1.7.18 and the changelog doesn=B9t seem to have been updated since 1.7.13?

There are 2 changelogs. One for the 2.x branch and one for the 1.8 branch. =

What you are seeing is the branch point where 2.x is progressing in its own =

way. The other changelog is here:

https://fedorahosted.org/audit/browser/branches/1.8/ChangeLog

-Steve