From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: user audits Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:54:35 -0500 Message-ID: <201012031054.35569.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <1291390837.2184.24.camel@lcb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1291390837.2184.24.camel@lcb> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Friday, December 03, 2010 10:40:37 am LC Bruzenak wrote: > Would there be any issue with adding a couple new trusted_application > event types? Would any kernel mods be needed to support this? Are these events originating in user space or the kernel? I might be convinced to set aside the block of IDs from 2600 - 2699 for local use if a suitable framework were written. This would mean that there is some config file that holds the local mapping of event IDs to text and ausearch/report/parse will need to be patched to understand local definitions. Would you be interested in this approach? -Steve