From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: Setting Audit Rules Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:06:26 -0400 Message-ID: <201107251506.26786.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <9180F6B27399C541B10663E21C8BDE9201D0F567@0461-its-exmb09.us.saic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9180F6B27399C541B10663E21C8BDE9201D0F567@0461-its-exmb09.us.saic.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com Cc: "Rye, Gene R." List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Monday, July 25, 2011 02:27:33 PM Rye, Gene R. wrote: > I am attempting to secure a RHEL 5 64bit system. I am modifying the > stig.rules file to use as the audit.rules file. The NSA guide > identifies some rules requiring the ARCH value to be either 64b or 32b. > Some existing rules have both OS versions being audited. Should I leave > both available even though my system is 64b or should I only use the 64b > options? All 64 bit x86_64 systems have both a 64 and 32 bit interface. So, you want both. 32 bit system don't and you would only want 32 bit values for it. -Steve