From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: new auparse question
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:55:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108312055.26888.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108311649.46375.sgrubb@redhat.com>
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 04:49:46 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 04:31:48 PM LC Bruzenak wrote:
> > So my question is - is this a bug (I would think so) or should I always
> > precede any auparse call sequence with at least one fresh
> > auparse_first_field call?
>
> A segfault is a bug as far as this library is concerned. I know other
> libraries let you segfault if you do something wrong. I'll try to make a
> reproducer and see what's going on.
Patch applied to svn:
https://fedorahosted.org/audit/changeset/567
-Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-31 20:31 new auparse question LC Bruzenak
2011-08-31 20:49 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-01 0:55 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108312055.26888.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox