From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Path ignored but syscall event still logged
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:04:22 -0500
Message-ID: <201201121004.22924.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <D0A5F96279337C499E18E7D5B0695A2F67FB30F5@HAMMBX04.uk.betfair.local>
	<D0A5F96279337C499E18E7D5B0695A2F67FC95AC@HAMMBX04.uk.betfair.local>
	<D0A5F96279337C499E18E7D5B0695A2F67FF63BA@HAMMBX04.uk.betfair.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0A5F96279337C499E18E7D5B0695A2F67FF63BA@HAMMBX04.uk.betfair.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Thursday, January 12, 2012 09:45:59 AM Max Williams wrote:
> Sorry to bug you but is this issue I'm having a bug or have I made a
> mistake in the rules? Is there another way I could exclude this directory
> from auditd? We have licenses for these servers so I could open a case if
> need be.

The preliminary investigation was its a kernel bug. It needs to be checked in 
more detail to see what the fix is.

-Steve