From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Henrique Cerri <mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] auparse: apparmor fields
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:08:47 -0300
Message-ID: <20120302140847.747e2ab4@oc8526070481.ibm.com>
References: <1329482562-21751-1-git-send-email-mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<1329747426-12625-1-git-send-email-mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<201202281815.48924.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx13.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
	[10.5.110.18])
	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP
	id q22H8x8O012694
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:08:59 -0500
Received: from e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (e24smtp03.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.24])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q22H8w6T030198
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:08:58 -0500
Received: from /spool/local
	by e24smtp03.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use
	Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com> from <mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
	Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:08:54 -0300
In-Reply-To: <201202281815.48924.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, gcwilson@us.ibm.com, bryntcor@us.ibm.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Thanks, Steve.

I've run some tests and it's ok. The same for the other two patches.

I just had to fix some small bugs in the output of configure. Please,
take a look at the patch I've just sent.

Regards,
Marcelo

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:15:48 -0500
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Monday, February 20, 2012 09:17:06 AM Marcelo Cerri wrote:
> > Just an update for the last patch. This patch contains a complete
> > list of apparmor avc fields.
> 
> It needed #ifdef WITH_APPARMOR since its a compile time option. I
> added the ifdef, you might want to make sure it still works.  Applied.
> 
> -Steve
> 
> > Regards,
> > Marcelo
> > ---
> >  auparse/typetab.h |    7 +++++++#ifdef WITH_APPARMOR
> >  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/auparse/typetab.h b/auparse/typetab.h
> > index 7838c17..27c0ffb 100644
> > --- a/auparse/typetab.h
> > +++ b/auparse/typetab.h
> > @@ -86,3 +86,10 @@ _S(AUPARSE_TYPE_NFPROTO,	"family"	)
> >  _S(AUPARSE_TYPE_ICMPTYPE,	"icmptype"	)
> >  _S(AUPARSE_TYPE_PROTOCOL,	"proto"		)
> >  _S(AUPARSE_TYPE_ADDR,		"addr"		)
> > +_S(AUPARSE_TYPE_ESCAPED,	"apparmor"	)
> > +_S(AUPARSE_TYPE_ESCAPED,	"operation"	)
> > +_S(AUPARSE_TYPE_ESCAPED,	"denied_mask"	)
> > +_S(AUPARSE_TYPE_ESCAPED,	"info"		)
> > +_S(AUPARSE_TYPE_ESCAPED,	"profile"	)
> > +_S(AUPARSE_TYPE_ESCAPED,	"requested_mask")
> > +
>