From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Quinney Subject: Re: auditctl exit code Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:31:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20120515083142.GA31126@finlaggan.inf.ed.ac.uk> References: <20120511122006.GA16481@kildalton> <201205111034.52259.sgrubb@redhat.com> <201205142003.27834.sgrubb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201205142003.27834.sgrubb@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:03:27PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:34:52 AM Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 08:20:06 AM Stephen Quinney wrote: > > > I am using Linux Audit version 2.1.3 and I'm wondering if the > > > following behaviour of auditctl is intentional. > > > > > > When I do a complete > > > list of the current rules (with auditctl -l) I get an exit code of > > > zero, as expected. When I do a list which is restricted to a > > > particular key (auditctl -l -k foo) I get 255. It doesn't matter which > > > of my keys I use and there are no error messages sent to stderr to > > > indicate a problem. The auditctl manpage doesn't say what various exit > > > values mean so I'm not sure what type of error is occurring. > > > > No. I think its a bug in the code. > > This should fix it: > https://fedorahosted.org/audit/changeset/694 > Thanks for the patch. I've just rebuilt the code with the patch applied and it now works correctly. Cheers, Stephen -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.