From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Bigonville Subject: Embedded libev library Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:13:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20130209161352.677c9c42@fornost.bigon.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx15.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.20]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r19FE6gc016262 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:14:06 -0500 Received: from anor.bigon.be (anor.bigon.be [91.121.173.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r19FE48B009383 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:14:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by anor.bigon.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634FA1A0BF for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:14:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from anor.bigon.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (anor.bigon.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1OhCvqus3ygk for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:14:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from fornost.bigon.be (unknown [IPv6:2a02:578:85fc:1:226:18ff:fe08:6073]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bigon) by anor.bigon.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C9551A045 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:14:01 +0100 (CET) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com Hello, I've a question about the embedded version of libev. Is there any particular reason you are shipping it? Or is it only for convenience? The Debian archive is containing already containing libev (4.11) and it's usually considered bad practice to embed libraries that are already contained in the archive. Would you accept a patch to allow building audit against the system libev library? Cheers Laurent Bigonville