From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: Add audit support Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:34:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20131108143456.GJ17461@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1383733546-2846-1-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1383733546-2846-1-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: AKASHI Takahiro Cc: "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "patches@linaro.org" , Catalin Marinas , eparis@redhat.com, "linux-audit@redhat.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:25:42AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > This patchset adds audit support on arm64. > The implementation is just like in other architectures, > and so I think little explanation is needed. That doesn't mean you can just omit the commit messages! > I'd like to discuss about the following issues: > (issues) > * AUDIT_ARCH_* > Why do we need to distiguish big-endian and little-endian? [2/4] We don't. This is only the case if the syscall ABIs differ between them (for AArch32, people mistakenly thought __ARMEB__ was related to AEABI. > * Userspace audit package > There are some missing syscall definitions in lib/aarch64_table.h. > There is no support for AUDIT_ARCH_ARM (I mean LE. armeb is BE). I did post something over a year ago... did it not get picked up? http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/165266 Will