From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Follow up on command line auditing
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:07:17 -0500
Message-ID: <20131202160717.GF20438@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
References: <1385998941-15301-1-git-send-email-wroberts@tresys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1385998941-15301-1-git-send-email-wroberts@tresys.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: William Roberts <bill.c.roberts@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:42:20AM -0800, William Roberts wrote:
> Changelog since last post:
> * Rebase on latest master
> 
> [PATCH] audit: Audit proc cmdline value

Hi Bill,

I wasn't expecting that you would squash everything down into one patch.
I think it should be at least two.  I'm comfortable with the changes in
the audit subsystem.  Could those be one patch?  As for the changes to
proc (including base and util) those might be better as a seperate
patch.


- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545