From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: allow unlimited backlog queue
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:12:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140115171228.GF23247@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22062657.DxdUxBxj9N@x2>
On 14/01/15, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:46:54 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 14/01/15, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 06:04:32 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > On 14/01/14, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > > Since audit can already be disabled by "audit=0" on the kernel boot
> > > > > line,
> > > > > or by the command "auditctl -e 0", it would be more useful to have the
> > > > > audit_backlog_limit set to zero mean effectively unlimited (limited
> > > > > only
> > > > > by system resources).
> > > > >
> > > > > These are userspace source code documentation changes in what's going
> > > > > in
> > > > >
> > > > > upstream. See:
> > > > > audit: allow unlimited backlog queue
> > > > >
> > > > > git://toccata2.tricolour.ca/linux-2.6-rgb.git
> > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/22/356
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2013-October/msg00029.html
> > > >
> > > > And this is a related BZ:
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999756
> > >
> > > This patch doesn't make sense in that context either. The problem is
> > > systemd floods the audit system before auditd comes up. This begs the
> > > question of whether auditd is being started early enough.
> >
> > Or that the queue isn't long enough.
> >
> > Do you have any specific ideas on getting auditd started earlier?
>
> It would be explaining to the systemd people what problem we are having and
> asking for advice or changes to their sequence of what gets started when.
>
>
> > > One solution from that bz is to make a boot time config option. Problem
> > > is,
> > > everyone that really cares about audit will have to set that. So that
> > > means
> > > the default should be bumped up. However, the bz mentions that embedded
> > > systems don't like that. So, why not make a compile time config option
> > > that
> > > keeps the current default (64) and server/desktop distributions can make
> > > that 512? You can even provide a boot time config so that people with
> > > really busy systems can make it bigger if they choose.
> >
> > There is a boot config option that has just been added to do that too:
> > audit: add kernel set-up parameter to override default backlog limit
> >
> > It will be upstream in 3.13.
> >
> > Eric and I discussed bumping up the default. I would have liked to have
> > seen somewhere between 320 and 512, but that default would make the
> > embedded folks unhappy and I don't really want to get into the more
> > complex idea of having it guess what type of system it is trying to
> > configure to give a smaller number for embedded systems (which aren't
> > all small) and bigger ones to servers (which aren't all big).
>
> What about making it a compile time choice in the kernel config? I suggested
> making a compile time option, distributions can bump that up to 512, the
> default is enough and it can be tuned. Embedded can make the default whatever
> they want, too.
Eric and I had discussed that too, and I understand there is
considerable pushback to adding to kconfig, so that option would be
harder to get accepted.
> -Steve
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 22:59 [PATCH] audit: allow unlimited backlog queue Richard Guy Briggs
2014-01-14 23:04 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-01-15 13:03 ` Steve Grubb
2014-01-15 16:46 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-01-15 16:57 ` Steve Grubb
2014-01-15 17:12 ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2014-01-15 17:24 ` Steve Grubb
2014-01-15 17:31 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-01-15 1:19 ` Gao feng
2014-01-15 12:53 ` Steve Grubb
2014-01-15 16:50 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140115171228.GF23247@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
--to=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox