public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: add arch field to seccomp event log
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:37:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140219193751.GP16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219031519.GM16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca>

On 14/02/18, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 14/02/18, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 03:50:44 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > missing '='   but this isn't what audit_get_context() does...   it's
> > > > crappy naming...    I'd think a combo of audit_dummy_context() and
> > > > current->audit_context would be most appropriate.
> > > 
> > > Ok.  I think I finally understand audit_dummy_context().  Thanks for the
> > > hint.  However, it appears it is not useful in this sitation, since if
> > > there is an audit_context, even a dummy context, it appears arch is
> > > filled in.
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > > @@ -2406,12 +2406,18 @@ void audit_core_dumps(long signr)
> > >  void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code)
> > >  {
> > >         struct audit_buffer *ab;
> > > +       struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
> > >  
> > >         ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_SECCOMP);
> > >         if (unlikely(!ab))
> > >                 return;
> > >         audit_log_task(ab);
> > >         audit_log_format(ab, " sig=%ld", signr);
> > > +       audit_log_format(ab, " arch=");
> > > +       if (context)
> > > +               audit_log_format(ab, "%x", context->arch);
> > > +       else
> > > +               audit_log_format(ab, "(null)");
> > >         audit_log_format(ab, " syscall=%ld", syscall);
> > >         audit_log_format(ab, " compat=%d", is_compat_task());
> > >         audit_log_format(ab, " ip=0x%lx", KSTK_EIP(current));
> > 
> > Is there anything that could be passed by the caller that might identify the 
> > syscall ABI when this call was blocked? '(null)' still makes syscall number 
> > uninterpretable.
> 
> This is the way it is done in the existing record that prints a syscall
> record in audit_log_exit().
> 
> It is set by the arch-dependent assembler linkage for
> __audit_syscall_entry() or set by the arch-dependent ptrace code that
> calls audit_syscall_entry().  In some arches there are a couple of
> choices.
> 
> 
> To pass this in to __audit_seccomp() as an arg, I'd have to add that arg
> to:
> 	__audit_seccomp()
> 	audit_seccomp()
> 	__secure_computing()
> 	secure_computing()
> 
> 
> As you've pointed out in IRC, there is a syscall_get_arch(current, regs)
> that could be used to get the arch when an audit context is not yet created.

s390x architecture doesn't have it defined.  :(

> I was just looking for something like that...  I am noticing that all
> arches call a variant of syscall_trace_enter() which first calls
> secure_computing() [which eventually calls __audit_seccomp()] *before*
> calling audit_syscall_entry() [which eventually sets context->arch].  So
> I'm not sure how task->audit_context->arch got set...  Perhaps
> __audit_syscall_entry() should just call syscall_get_arch() instead of
> lugging it through the stack like it presently does.
> 
> Is this going to give the same information?  (I guess I should be able
> to answer that question...)
> 
> > -Steve
> 
> - RGB

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-19 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-14 20:23 [PATCH] audit: add arch field to seccomp event log Richard Guy Briggs
2014-02-14 20:49 ` Eric Paris
2014-02-14 20:50   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-02-14 20:52     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-02-14 21:12       ` Eric Paris
2014-02-18 20:50         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-02-18 20:55           ` Eric Paris
2014-02-18 21:01           ` Steve Grubb
2014-02-19  3:15             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-02-19 19:37               ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2014-02-21 23:32                 ` Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140219193751.GP16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
    --to=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox