From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][RFC] pid: changes to support audit Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:08:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20140220190816.GD23993@redhat.com> References: <20131220140417.GE14884@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <8aa73d2b884439496f87d5f34c12ba9b4b40f7e5.1377032086.git.rgb@redhat.com> <20131217095801.GF21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20131220044826.GF14944@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20131220085846.GA21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140219161858.GN16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20140219174745.GA9784@redhat.com> <20140219181501.GO16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140219181501.GO16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, eparis@redhat.com, sgrubb@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On 02/19, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > On 14/02/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > But at first glance, can't you send 2/7 first and join 1/7 and 3/7? > > Yes, Peter made the same observation. I thought it was more useful to > have them seperated out, but I'll join them. Yes, thanks, I think it doesn't make sense to uglify the code in 1/7 and then fix it in 2/7. > > And since you change is_global_init() perhaps you can also fix it? > > It actually needs tgid. > > Sure. Can you explain why? We only want init killing off its own > threads? Please see my reply to 5/7. Oleg.