From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
"linux-audit@redhat.com" <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: audit: Fix build for audit changes
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:21:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140725092108.GB24268@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140724191237.GM17528@sirena.org.uk>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:12:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:26:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > From: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
> >
> > Commit 3efe33f5d2 (audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry()
> > interface) removed the arch parameter from __audit_syscall_entry() and
> > updated the only current user in mainline but this breaks the ARMv8 audit
> > code that has been added in -next. Fix this by making the equivalent
> > update to ARMv8.
>
> This is still broken -next.
It should now be temporarily fixed for the defconfig
(CONFIG_AUTIDSYSCALL disabled). I'm reluctant to merge the audit tree in
the arm64 tree as (a) I haven't seen a confirmation that this branch is
stable and will go upstream as is and (b) there are x86 changes without
Acks from the x86 maintainers (whether needed or not, I can't say).
So my temporary patch is some #ifndef's around the offending code. It
will be reverted and your patch applied once the audit tree meets the
arm64 tree.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 11:26 [PATCH] arm64: audit: Fix build for audit changes Mark Brown
2014-07-17 11:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-17 14:50 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-17 14:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-17 15:01 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-17 16:26 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-07-24 19:12 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-25 9:21 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-07-25 11:04 ` Mark Brown
2014-08-11 9:09 ` Will Deacon
2014-08-11 13:22 ` Eric Paris
2014-08-11 13:33 ` Will Deacon
2014-08-11 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-11 15:47 ` Will Deacon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-17 14:26 Mark Brown
2014-08-18 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140725092108.GB24268@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox