From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: audit: Fix build for audit changes Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:04:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20140725110404.GQ17528@sirena.org.uk> References: <1405596402-23844-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> <20140724191237.GM17528@sirena.org.uk> <20140725092108.GB24268@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2308331607921035646==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140725092108.GB24268@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Catalin Marinas Cc: "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , Richard Guy Briggs , Will Deacon , Eric Paris , "linux-audit@redhat.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com --===============2308331607921035646== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KQtzXpABaZjuvfJ9" Content-Disposition: inline --KQtzXpABaZjuvfJ9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:12:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > This is still broken -next. > It should now be temporarily fixed for the defconfig > (CONFIG_AUTIDSYSCALL disabled). I'm reluctant to merge the audit tree in > the arm64 tree as (a) I haven't seen a confirmation that this branch is > stable and will go upstream as is and (b) there are x86 changes without > Acks from the x86 maintainers (whether needed or not, I can't say). I'd not expect it to be essential, it's just a function prototype change. > So my temporary patch is some #ifndef's around the offending code. It > will be reverted and your patch applied once the audit tree meets the > arm64 tree. That's good thanks, though it's still going to mean we have massive bisection breaks and anyone with an existing config will run into trouble - I'm going to be adding all*config builds to my daily tests soon too which will still trigger the issue). =20 I suspect the easiest thing would be to cherry pick the commit over (it can always be reverted later on if there's an issue) if a shared branch can't be arranged. It's a real shame Eric hasn't replied here... --KQtzXpABaZjuvfJ9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT0jmhAAoJELSic+t+oim9SDUP+wSwLiQE1UxbENrTIabozEbC pkgLWT6MS3M9q8s1FUTHC/zEBnjljn1WVaKII5qWybFuclfpSthcMZU1JD7GwufY QL6XZ/V0b8cchyDa5XsO1fMocbuJuu1XhxTesP1b9tlU/PGt1xPfMCZ/g015WurT vr0UzdKBCBKn11t0l7UEchEcX1/iiAucWu1n0k4pZqdyy5vEUrBtVs7sY7o+1U8D hr2CuC0cKfYNWSsDp7yDeWzDKMTidqNY9o+e8kD0ALUY7F8tEQIIQe7TFPfzWNaM t9fTKpc/k2uTWKZmS3HedKnjXaZia8vBw/Sb0lW27oqzUv2nRqDr6furGkynyoCA c+/bZmfXOtozIOw2ZCVD3Fer14vI59LHgzORImTXcZC8k+B9oZ3atfWLA+C9vJSQ 4ffFzF2tWPbFFoI6tNQN6viC3AW0nnxMxz1o9UmnIoMprQA/T4bpPkrRSYXkCyoo IrRAdTHbHHF2+xmHIfDUsmfXdDiKc8A8l52Nl5SRZ2EIjPouqZrR5kgm5Aq44KGj qOoIcvQKfQr6waxPkU6FrbtLf3mfTWVw0iXhdJL9jKuBJkfW0TOgSIAeQPlFqeDS I2Rs2vnDS9KWVMhUYhhcANuVdF9JVAgfopEes7Dt7GwLKZYsmaa15bQ1KuN2Jf+8 H5XVqyQiVR9y5qLaLEjd =acXP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KQtzXpABaZjuvfJ9-- --===============2308331607921035646== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============2308331607921035646==--