From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zbigniew =?utf-8?Q?J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= Subject: Re: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:49:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20150726214950.GC27014@in.waw.pl> References: <20150726155844.3af70ed0@fornost.bigon.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6QLnrek031192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:49:54 -0400 Received: from kawka.in.waw.pl (kawka.in.waw.pl [178.62.225.244]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B109E83F68 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150726155844.3af70ed0@fornost.bigon.be> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Laurent Bigonville Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, 787066-forwarded@bugs.debian.org List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 03:58:44PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Hi, > > Apparently audit is FTBFS with clang due to the embedded version of > libev with the following error (see: [0]): > > ../../../../src/libev/ev.c:970:42: error: '_Noreturn' keyword must > precede function declarator > > The bug[0] provides a patch. I don't think this has been fixed > upstream yet. There was however a small thread [1] about this on > upstream ML. > > Not sure what's the policy regarding patching embedded copy of libev. The policy is to kill the embedded copy as soon as possible. Seems like a good time to do that. Zbyszek