From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: v.rathor@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 12:58:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150907165818.GH8140@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e786f07b6d8a19927c70345c14bd1a452164d38.1441644314.git.rgb@redhat.com>
On 15/09/07, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> Nothing prevents a new auditd starting up and replacing a valid
> audit_pid when an old auditd is still running, effectively starving out
> the old auditd since audit_pid no longer points to the old valid auditd.
>
> There isn't an easy way to detect if an old auditd is still running on
> the existing audit_pid other than attempting to send a message to see if
> it fails. If no message to auditd has been attempted since auditd died
> unnaturally or got killed, audit_pid will still indicate it is alive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Ok, self-nack on this one for a couple of problems...
netlink_getsockbyportid() is static to af_netlink.c and "pid" should be
task_tgid_vnr(current). Otherwise, any opinions on this approach?
> ---
> Note: Would it be too bold to actually block the registration of a new
> auditd if the netlink_getsockbyportid() call succeeded? Would other
> checks be appropriate?
>
> kernel/audit.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 18cdfe2..1fa1e0d 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -872,6 +872,11 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
> if (s.mask & AUDIT_STATUS_PID) {
> int new_pid = s.pid;
>
> + if (audit_pid && new_pid &&
> + !IS_ERR(netlink_getsockbyportid(audit_sock, audit_nlk_portid)))
> + pr_warn("auditd replaced by new auditd before normal shutdown: "
> + "(old)audit_pid=%d (by)pid=%d new_pid=%d",
> + audit_pid, pid, new_pid);
> if ((!new_pid) && (task_tgid_vnr(current) != audit_pid))
> return -EACCES;
> if (audit_enabled != AUDIT_OFF)
> --
> 1.7.1
>
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-07 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-07 16:48 [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs
2015-09-07 16:58 ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2015-09-09 20:50 ` Paul Moore
2015-09-11 10:21 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-09-11 18:56 ` Paul Moore
2015-09-13 16:08 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-09-14 19:37 ` Paul Moore
2015-09-16 10:24 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-09-16 21:45 ` Paul Moore
2015-09-17 11:35 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-09-17 22:40 ` Paul Moore
2015-09-08 14:57 ` Eric Paris
2015-09-09 6:31 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150907165818.GH8140@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
--to=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v.rathor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox