From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@infradead.org>
Subject: AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT message format
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:25:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117052551.GQ3087@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
Hi,
I'm just starting to look at the normalization of AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT
event messages and it is not quite as straightforward as I had expected.
It is being tracked here:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/11
and refers to a previous posting from Mr. Dash Four from four years ago
to which there was no reply.
The example given in the tracker above for "frag=" is fairly
straightforward, but digging more, there are a number of others that are
not quite so obvious.
How many different combinations of fields is acceptable? Can we create
new message types for each one, or is there a preferred way to indicate
which sub-type it is other than implicit from the arguments given?
Others that are straightforward:
- The first "truncated=" gets pulled in with "0".
- "mark=" gets pulled in with "0".
Ones that are not so straightforward:
- "secmark" depends on a kernel config setting, so should it always be
present but "(none)" if that kernel feature is compiled out?
- ARPHRD_ETHER pulls in 3 fields, I would pull them all in and set them
to "(none)" to indicate that type isn't present.
- audit_ip4() and audit_ip6 share "saddr=", "daddr=", proto=", but ip4
adds "ipid=", which would be set to "(none)" for ip6.
- audit_proto() pulls in "truncated=" again, then either "sport=" and
"dport=" OR "icmptype=" and "icmpcode=".
If all fields are pulled in, we end up adding 10 fields beyond a
standard well-formed packet, and 15 beyond a truncated packet.
Note: In the cases of "mark" and "secmark" both are unions. In the case of
"mark", I don't see a problem since it isn't conditionally compiled out
and won't be mis-interpreted. In the case of "secmark=", it could be
mis-interpreted as offload_fwd_mark if that field is even compiled in,
but that would be addressed in the compiler directive...
One last question: Does anyone have a test suite that can generate any
or all of these types of packets?
Thanks!
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Kernel Security Engineering, Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
next reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 5:25 Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2017-01-17 13:55 ` AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT message format Steve Grubb
2017-01-17 16:12 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-17 16:29 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-17 18:35 ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-17 20:17 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-18 2:34 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-18 5:39 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-18 12:32 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-18 14:52 ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-18 15:15 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-18 23:35 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-20 14:49 ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-20 20:37 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-21 11:27 ` Patrick PIGNOL
2017-01-21 17:37 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-21 19:12 ` Patrick PIGNOL
2017-01-23 4:49 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-07 20:52 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-08 3:56 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-08 16:30 ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-08 23:09 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-09 10:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-09 16:31 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-09 23:49 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-10 0:09 ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-10 1:12 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-10 22:39 ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-10 22:54 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-13 17:57 ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-13 20:50 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-13 23:50 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-14 0:24 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-14 21:06 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-16 22:41 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-16 0:32 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-16 22:36 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-17 1:57 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-17 2:24 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-17 23:04 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-26 19:09 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-14 21:31 ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-16 21:24 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170117052551.GQ3087@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
--to=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox