public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@infradead.org>
Subject: AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT message format
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:25:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117052551.GQ3087@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)

Hi,

I'm just starting to look at the normalization of AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT
event messages and it is not quite as straightforward as I had expected.

It is being tracked here:
	https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/11
and refers to a previous posting from Mr. Dash Four from four years ago
to which there was no reply.

The example given in the tracker above for "frag=" is fairly
straightforward, but digging more, there are a number of others that are
not quite so obvious.

How many different combinations of fields is acceptable?  Can we create
new message types for each one, or is there a preferred way to indicate
which sub-type it is other than implicit from the arguments given?

Others that are straightforward:
- The first "truncated=" gets pulled in with "0".

- "mark=" gets pulled in with "0".

Ones that are not so straightforward:
- "secmark" depends on a kernel config setting, so should it always be
  present but "(none)" if that kernel feature is compiled out?

- ARPHRD_ETHER pulls in 3 fields, I would pull them all in and set them
  to "(none)" to indicate that type isn't present.

- audit_ip4() and audit_ip6 share "saddr=", "daddr=", proto=", but ip4
  adds "ipid=", which would be set to "(none)" for ip6.

- audit_proto() pulls in "truncated=" again, then either "sport=" and
  "dport=" OR "icmptype=" and "icmpcode=".

If all fields are pulled in, we end up adding 10 fields beyond a
standard well-formed packet, and 15 beyond a truncated packet.

Note: In the cases of "mark" and "secmark" both are unions.  In the case of
"mark", I don't see a problem since it isn't conditionally compiled out
and won't be mis-interpreted.  In the case of "secmark=", it could be
mis-interpreted as offload_fwd_mark if that field is even compiled in,
but that would be addressed in the compiler directive...


One last question: Does anyone have a test suite that can generate any
or all of these types of packets?


Thanks!


- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Kernel Security Engineering, Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

             reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-17  5:25 Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2017-01-17 13:55 ` AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT message format Steve Grubb
2017-01-17 16:12   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-17 16:29     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-17 18:35       ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-17 20:17     ` Paul Moore
2017-01-18  2:34       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-18  5:39         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-18 12:32           ` Paul Moore
2017-01-18 14:52             ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-18 15:15             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-18 23:35               ` Paul Moore
2017-01-20 14:49                 ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-20 20:37                   ` Paul Moore
2017-01-21 11:27                     ` Patrick PIGNOL
2017-01-21 17:37                       ` Paul Moore
2017-01-21 19:12                         ` Patrick PIGNOL
2017-01-23  4:49                           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-07 20:52                   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-08  3:56                     ` Paul Moore
2017-02-08 16:30                       ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-08 23:09                         ` Paul Moore
2017-02-09 10:56                           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-09 16:31                             ` Paul Moore
2017-02-09 23:49                           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-10  0:09                             ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-10  1:12                               ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-10 22:39                                 ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-10 22:54                                   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-13 17:57                                     ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-13 20:50                                       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-13 23:50                                         ` Paul Moore
2017-02-14  0:24                                           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-14 21:06                                             ` Paul Moore
2017-02-16 22:41                                               ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-16  0:32                                             ` Paul Moore
2017-02-16 22:36                                               ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-17  1:57                                                 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-17  2:24                                                   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-17 23:04                                                 ` Paul Moore
2017-02-26 19:09                                             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-02-14 21:31                                         ` Steve Grubb
2017-02-16 21:24                                           ` Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170117052551.GQ3087@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
    --to=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgraf@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox