From: Greg Edwards <gedwards@ddn.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] audit: move processing of "audit" boot param to audit_init()
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:52:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227225217.GA23374@psuche> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQT+RzYVA6QTrmaoX3bKZxehtPJAFwBh=2sRwWA8yo7-A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 05:28:09PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Greg Edwards <gedwards@ddn.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:00:51PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>>>
>>> In the process of trying to explain things a bit further (see the
>>> discussion thread in 0/2), I realized that some example code might
>>> speak better than I could. Below is what I was thinking for a fix; I
>>> haven't tested it, so it may blow up badly, but hopefully it makes
>>> things a bit more clear.
>>>
>>> One thing of note, I did away with the kstrtol() altogether, when we
>>> are only looking for zero and one it seems easier to just compare the
>>> strings.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
>>> index 1a3e75d9a66c..5dd63f60ef90 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/audit.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
>>> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/gfp.h>
>>> #include <linux/pid.h>
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/string.h>
>>>
>>> #include <linux/audit.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -86,6 +87,7 @@ static int audit_initialized;
>>> #define AUDIT_OFF 0
>>> #define AUDIT_ON 1
>>> #define AUDIT_LOCKED 2
>>> +#define AUDIT_ARGERR 3 /* indicate a "audit=X" syntax error at boot */
>>> u32 audit_enabled = AUDIT_OFF;
>>> bool audit_ever_enabled = !!AUDIT_OFF;
>>>
>>> @@ -1581,6 +1583,12 @@ static int __init audit_init(void)
>>> if (audit_initialized == AUDIT_DISABLED)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + /* handle any delayed error reporting from audit_enable() */
>>> + if (audit_default == AUDIT_ARGERR) {
>>> + pr_err("invalid 'audit' parameter value, use 0 or 1\n");
>>> + audit_default = AUDIT_ON;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>> If you are just going to pr_err() on invalid audit parameter instead of
>> panic, you don't need AUDIT_ARGERR at all or the delayed error reporting
>> of it here. You can just use pr_err() in audit_enable() directly.
>
> I thought the issue was that we couldn't reliably write to the console
> in audit_enable() as it required early printks to be enabled?
You can't reliably panic from audit_enable() unless earlyprintk is
enabled, since the boot stops at the panic and the regular console isn't
initialized yet. pr_err/printk etc work fine, as those messages just
get queued up and output once the regular console is initialized (since
the boot continues on).
So, if you want to keep the panic behavior on bad audit parameters, your
delayed processing should do the trick. If it instead, you are fine
with just pr_err and leaving audit enabled for that error case, then we
are almost back to my original patch, with the exceptions you previously
noted:
* leave audit enabled on parsing error
* change panic on audit_set_enabled() failure to pr_err
* handle on/off as well
My apologies if my commit message was misleading!
Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-23 0:22 [PATCH 0/2] audit boot parameter cleanups Greg Edwards
2018-02-23 0:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] audit: move processing of "audit" boot param to audit_init() Greg Edwards
2018-02-27 0:00 ` Paul Moore
2018-02-27 5:53 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-02-27 12:43 ` Paul Moore
2018-02-27 19:01 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-02-27 15:59 ` Greg Edwards
2018-02-27 22:28 ` Paul Moore
2018-02-27 22:52 ` Greg Edwards [this message]
2018-03-02 20:33 ` Paul Moore
2018-03-02 21:46 ` Greg Edwards
2018-03-02 22:30 ` Paul Moore
2018-02-23 0:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] audit: add "on"/"off" as valid boot parameter values Greg Edwards
2018-02-23 16:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] audit boot parameter cleanups Richard Guy Briggs
2018-02-23 23:58 ` Paul Moore
2018-02-26 4:58 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227225217.GA23374@psuche \
--to=gedwards@ddn.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).