From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Casey Schaufler Subject: [PATCH v15 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:04:03 -0800 Message-ID: <20200222000407.110158-10-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20200222000407.110158-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast03.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AABC2063FE6 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FAB800658 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:36 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20200222000407.110158-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com The IMA interfaces ima_get_action() and ima_match_policy() call LSM functions that use lsmblobs. Change the IMA functions to pass the lsmblob to be compatible with the LSM functions. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: John Johansen Acked-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 11 ++++----- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 10 ++++----- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 6 ++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 +++++----- 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index f9e3ca96fa52..a85aa57d28c5 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -230,9 +230,9 @@ static inline void ima_process_queued_keys(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS */ /* LIM API function definitions */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring); int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, @@ -258,8 +258,9 @@ void ima_free_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry); const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char **pathbuf, char *filename); /* IMA policy related functions */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring); void ima_init_policy(void); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index f6bc00914aa5..b481bbc2e55f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * ima_get_action - appraise & measure decision based on policy. * @inode: pointer to inode to measure * @cred: pointer to credentials structure to validate - * @secid: secid of the task being validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task being validated * @mask: contains the permission mask (MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC, * MAY_APPEND) * @func: caller identifier @@ -182,16 +182,16 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * Returns IMA_MEASURE, IMA_APPRAISE mask. * */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring) { int flags = IMA_MEASURE | IMA_AUDIT | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH; flags &= ima_policy_flag; - return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, secid, func, mask, flags, pcr, + return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, blob, func, mask, flags, pcr, template_desc, keyring); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 3dfb573c7171..bf66e3e6f398 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -54,10 +54,8 @@ int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func) return 0; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding the .secid[0] */ - return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], func, - mask, IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, - NULL); + return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), &blob, func, mask, + IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL); } static int ima_fix_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 8ad399ea7883..a6348dca299c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file) } static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, - u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask, - enum ima_hooks func) + struct lsmblob *blob, char *buf, loff_t size, + int mask, enum ima_hooks func) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL; @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, * bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy. * Included is the appraise submask. */ - action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, secid, mask, func, &pcr, + action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, blob, mask, func, &pcr, &template_desc, NULL); violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) && (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE)); @@ -388,8 +388,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot) if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK); } @@ -415,16 +414,14 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); + ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); if (ret) return ret; security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); + return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); } /** @@ -442,8 +439,7 @@ int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0, + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC | MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK); } @@ -624,9 +620,8 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf, - size, MAY_READ, func); + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, buf, size, + MAY_READ, func); } /** @@ -722,9 +717,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, */ if (func) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding */ - action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], 0, - func, &pcr, &template, keyring); + action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), &blob, 0, func, + &pcr, &template, keyring); if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) return; } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 5c3270050dd8..5ff6218a9c4a 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, * Returns true on rule match, false on failure. */ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, const char *keyring) { @@ -496,7 +496,6 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, case LSM_SUBJ_USER: case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE: case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE: - lsmblob_init(&blob, secid); rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, @@ -540,7 +539,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is * being made - * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task to be validated * @func: IMA hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @pcr: set the pcr to extend @@ -555,8 +554,9 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * list when walking it. Reads are many orders of magnitude more numerous * than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate. */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring) { @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, if (!(entry->action & actmask)) continue; - if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, secid, func, mask, + if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, blob, func, mask, keyring)) continue; -- 2.24.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2554DC35641 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDEF720828 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="fnZTmweU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BDEF720828 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=schaufler-ca.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582329945; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=Iz06utkmD+BmHyXZOf3Sn/1mCi5hLL2n9xESxhljzTI=; b=fnZTmweUJ7Y1LoP4usGI5S+YR6apK81hNoF4Hn7XY1lJfUAAK0UzFmHrIfjuPpV8cCRNoX BzzDfvIvZZzIUSxIr3xyO7QyFRyDOJkoZ9DgmOcrm/qrIDatM4KMAjBNTQdv/jTmPEI5v5 xKy2BsRs6Fq45tHzLSq1O3v3IcYfk0w= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-127-KWdwOjbzMgqWicWs1CM2Ow-1; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:05:43 -0500 X-MC-Unique: KWdwOjbzMgqWicWs1CM2Ow-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5112A800D48; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33FAE84BCC; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE77C18089C8; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 01M05cSU001574 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:05:38 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 6FC182063FEA; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast03.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AABC2063FE6 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FAB800658 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sonic315-27.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic315-27.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.190.153]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-438-5BEL7-kjPxeIxK_q4u5i-Q-1; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:05:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 5BEL7-kjPxeIxK_q4u5i-Q-1 X-YMail-OSG: G_6qJwMVM1mL2GKjiShS.YiUGwMKQRMMsAWjN.mq75yYaFD91YLatmbz2gv3Ozk fXv8kgPLtliwVdAshx83GC.jXw0wIFKkeUDDVKrMkHTMLyZzKZk.gg8eSPw8D0FArIT4vOFoeT71 pDrFjeDacsUrg77vV8QlZtAtpB.ozmhYc0ua3t3FJRfhBlRcJI0bsLQhWPJr.l31DJ0lYD3yTyJn ZPp2rBbphbA1z5gtk3j2Rst6cj8YANedTvktS6gyoupcXrsdTqWZD0K331sdTNlXlSFIk0c3jpQP F6Ih6K_.pcoU.xelSLOAGLomnAmvetHE3XK.HyzAn7YQEMH.gHpDcyEI2DI5hrZ.Mg23EuTHSGJf YjVkvVkBrBTQTiIOcrfEFyBKMm0xW2xh_jlsf0M7K3qBLAUh4Z7GF5D.rDF2.1fjMqYv2rXUkWkm 8KmH89buDGxwto8dxp3P6FOY9Pytau4H9J8sphSpiBRe8weKIc2IE9INrnTeu_Khw8KALSiSwIcW U1Uojs6huczKfGyzgtP7bD9Gwj77lZhvh9z8z9fOLGwBJd.heKS6ndNCiZ9XTFU_onGCNo9E0eLn CWCnHjp6GBT7HZkUyJR28Do_NF9RG_4Zb3IMApPXuTMoE9RW8laW0pMRTpL5DrmhAGtqvfHA6AQP tI1wW7eLB.Ief41Xniy5uQ2tJxHn9yBP_lu4gYvpB_M49tvRzBJnsWHiMPcqrwU36Qy1P3.__vV4 vF.hK_a7_EVnGO2FIuXbVBEo2kocLamFBkfbAE_dnRWHrQYop4MNn_aDDDoywqwOVy1blns0k40R k.S9HHViKAGIQFe7KIFbmmyFF9oohNyBkLk_o82MTTTK3VDfHBQelje_3Y2ggBVWYzs4_bMWfZ92 PGQLodqMawbvFFHHqseaKqNs_905ENIvIX5U_G865ftmykuMxpfyeZF9mwMNmo_MMNAgziBp7RnU 4ToZzCG1GJn1TZiH.hZmJsmEN6oORszcAXsaB.SAKpKrsJsZ_96jGnU8.58BSi8aJDo3M5NX1zJy _xkDp4YUmFlwFtHtwuyy6iihpqZyn9j0Ou1v7brGbQKPsW8SiBmFcTrKKfbirmTPy2qMxd6irCQX zvz58Lgou1r5G.sYgoqGnDNLpGBG.rfO7Ed_oEZYSC38f_dSAAwYkl5s0VrFZ.mjNelYq0t5R4nb alK7TeAPSgwOZYXz3NibbVYcdQYqhPESx9q85EmMSU01E1H20uVApRBCZGpdQFZ3m5dynKjrOMFW uvVz0epFQ8x7zXXVs4KPuqQkwFowpglMPp.krScD1oVXfZl6q24mpkU4PM4hF.fOyF9H7_1IgxN_ 70spQ0GmJ4CNFyiZ3PC7MSJRArIbf19PJYF1HpwfOT8jz3jthP6R1XDjuSBjiq1TExAPfnKKrdR4 tzI1a257B96FHKYpN9.lISGTX30MS0bb8CyB04EbMTgCJ1gYoOblraw-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:33 +0000 Received: by smtp407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID bc004ae203dd3a2252190e464b196e15; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:05:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Casey Schaufler To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, linux-audit@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH v15 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:04:03 -0800 Message-Id: <20200222000407.110158-10-casey@schaufler-ca.com> In-Reply-To: <20200222000407.110158-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20200222000407.110158-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com id 01M05cSU001574 X-loop: linux-audit@redhat.com X-BeenThere: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Linux Audit Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20200222000403.oNiDsXbHeDEeOwTWeg_4jwF5vV5IYdWI61LyPGQ6rqQ@z> The IMA interfaces ima_get_action() and ima_match_policy() call LSM functions that use lsmblobs. Change the IMA functions to pass the lsmblob to be compatible with the LSM functions. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: John Johansen Acked-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 11 ++++----- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 10 ++++----- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 6 ++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 +++++----- 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index f9e3ca96fa52..a85aa57d28c5 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -230,9 +230,9 @@ static inline void ima_process_queued_keys(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS */ /* LIM API function definitions */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring); int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, @@ -258,8 +258,9 @@ void ima_free_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry); const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char **pathbuf, char *filename); /* IMA policy related functions */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring); void ima_init_policy(void); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index f6bc00914aa5..b481bbc2e55f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * ima_get_action - appraise & measure decision based on policy. * @inode: pointer to inode to measure * @cred: pointer to credentials structure to validate - * @secid: secid of the task being validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task being validated * @mask: contains the permission mask (MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC, * MAY_APPEND) * @func: caller identifier @@ -182,16 +182,16 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * Returns IMA_MEASURE, IMA_APPRAISE mask. * */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring) { int flags = IMA_MEASURE | IMA_AUDIT | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH; flags &= ima_policy_flag; - return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, secid, func, mask, flags, pcr, + return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, blob, func, mask, flags, pcr, template_desc, keyring); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 3dfb573c7171..bf66e3e6f398 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -54,10 +54,8 @@ int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func) return 0; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding the .secid[0] */ - return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], func, - mask, IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, - NULL); + return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), &blob, func, mask, + IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL); } static int ima_fix_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 8ad399ea7883..a6348dca299c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file) } static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, - u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask, - enum ima_hooks func) + struct lsmblob *blob, char *buf, loff_t size, + int mask, enum ima_hooks func) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL; @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, * bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy. * Included is the appraise submask. */ - action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, secid, mask, func, &pcr, + action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, blob, mask, func, &pcr, &template_desc, NULL); violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) && (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE)); @@ -388,8 +388,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot) if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK); } @@ -415,16 +414,14 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); + ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); if (ret) return ret; security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); + return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); } /** @@ -442,8 +439,7 @@ int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0, + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC | MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK); } @@ -624,9 +620,8 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf, - size, MAY_READ, func); + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, buf, size, + MAY_READ, func); } /** @@ -722,9 +717,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, */ if (func) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding */ - action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], 0, - func, &pcr, &template, keyring); + action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), &blob, 0, func, + &pcr, &template, keyring); if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) return; } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 5c3270050dd8..5ff6218a9c4a 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, * Returns true on rule match, false on failure. */ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, const char *keyring) { @@ -496,7 +496,6 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, case LSM_SUBJ_USER: case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE: case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE: - lsmblob_init(&blob, secid); rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, @@ -540,7 +539,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is * being made - * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task to be validated * @func: IMA hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @pcr: set the pcr to extend @@ -555,8 +554,9 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * list when walking it. Reads are many orders of magnitude more numerous * than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate. */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring) { @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, if (!(entry->action & actmask)) continue; - if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, secid, func, mask, + if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, blob, func, mask, keyring)) continue; -- 2.24.1 -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit