public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v20 17/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:52:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200826145247.10029-18-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200826145247.10029-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Change netlink netfilter interfaces to use lsmcontext
pointers, and remove scaffolding.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
index d3f8e808c5d3..c830401f7792 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
@@ -301,12 +301,10 @@ static int nfqnl_put_sk_uidgid(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static u32 nfqnl_get_sk_secctx(struct sk_buff *skb, char **secdata)
+static u32 nfqnl_get_sk_secctx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct lsmcontext *context)
 {
-	u32 seclen = 0;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK)
 	struct lsmblob blob;
-	struct lsmcontext context = { };
 
 	if (!skb || !sk_fullsock(skb->sk))
 		return 0;
@@ -318,14 +316,14 @@ static u32 nfqnl_get_sk_secctx(struct sk_buff *skb, char **secdata)
 		 * blob. security_secid_to_secctx() will know which security
 		 * module to use to create the secctx.  */
 		lsmblob_init(&blob, skb->secmark);
-		security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context);
-		*secdata = context.context;
+		security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, context);
 	}
 
 	read_unlock_bh(&skb->sk->sk_callback_lock);
-	seclen = context.len;
+	return context->len;
+#else
+	return 0;
 #endif
-	return seclen;
 }
 
 static u32 nfqnl_get_bridge_size(struct nf_queue_entry *entry)
@@ -401,8 +399,7 @@ nfqnl_build_packet_message(struct net *net, struct nfqnl_instance *queue,
 	enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
 	struct nfnl_ct_hook *nfnl_ct;
 	bool csum_verify;
-	struct lsmcontext scaff; /* scaffolding */
-	char *secdata = NULL;
+	struct lsmcontext context = { };
 	u32 seclen = 0;
 
 	size = nlmsg_total_size(sizeof(struct nfgenmsg))
@@ -469,7 +466,7 @@ nfqnl_build_packet_message(struct net *net, struct nfqnl_instance *queue,
 	}
 
 	if ((queue->flags & NFQA_CFG_F_SECCTX) && entskb->sk) {
-		seclen = nfqnl_get_sk_secctx(entskb, &secdata);
+		seclen = nfqnl_get_sk_secctx(entskb, &context);
 		if (seclen)
 			size += nla_total_size(seclen);
 	}
@@ -604,7 +601,7 @@ nfqnl_build_packet_message(struct net *net, struct nfqnl_instance *queue,
 	    nfqnl_put_sk_uidgid(skb, entskb->sk) < 0)
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 
-	if (seclen && nla_put(skb, NFQA_SECCTX, seclen, secdata))
+	if (seclen && nla_put(skb, NFQA_SECCTX, context.len, context.context))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 
 	if (ct && nfnl_ct->build(skb, ct, ctinfo, NFQA_CT, NFQA_CT_INFO) < 0)
@@ -632,10 +629,8 @@ nfqnl_build_packet_message(struct net *net, struct nfqnl_instance *queue,
 	}
 
 	nlh->nlmsg_len = skb->len;
-	if (seclen) {
-		lsmcontext_init(&scaff, secdata, seclen, 0);
-		security_release_secctx(&scaff);
-	}
+	if (seclen)
+		security_release_secctx(&context);
 	return skb;
 
 nla_put_failure:
@@ -643,10 +638,8 @@ nfqnl_build_packet_message(struct net *net, struct nfqnl_instance *queue,
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 	net_err_ratelimited("nf_queue: error creating packet message\n");
 nlmsg_failure:
-	if (seclen) {
-		lsmcontext_init(&scaff, secdata, seclen, 0);
-		security_release_secctx(&scaff);
-	}
+	if (seclen)
+		security_release_secctx(&context);
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-- 
2.24.1

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-26 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200826145247.10029-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:50     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 18:53     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 04/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 19:46     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 05/23] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2020-09-03 16:28     ` James Morris
2020-09-04 20:08     ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 21:35       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:53         ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 23:58           ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 13:25             ` Paul Moore
2020-09-05 18:13               ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 19:05                 ` John Johansen
2020-09-08  1:28                   ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-08 13:35                     ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-08 23:37                       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-09  0:21                         ` John Johansen
2020-09-09 13:19                           ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-09 18:19                             ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-09 18:33                               ` John Johansen
2020-09-09 18:47                             ` John Johansen
2020-09-10 14:11                               ` Paul Moore
2020-09-09  0:17                       ` John Johansen
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 06/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:29     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:59     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 13:12     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 13:18     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 13:20     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06  2:28     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 13/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 14/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06  2:45     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06  2:55     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2020-09-06  3:11     ` [PATCH v20 17/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Paul Moore
2020-09-08 10:46     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 18/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06  3:27     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 19/23] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06  3:30     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 20/23] Audit: Add new record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2020-09-03 16:32     ` James Morris
2020-09-03 17:00       ` John Johansen
2020-09-03 21:49       ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 16:32     ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 21/23] Audit: Add a new record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 18:02     ` Randy Dunlap
2020-08-26 14:52   ` [PATCH v20 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 15:27   ` [PATCH v20 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200826145247.10029-18-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox