From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v31 01/28] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 21:33:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202112142134.jipW98iP-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213234034.111891-2-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Hi Casey,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on nf-next/master]
[also build test ERROR on nf/master linus/master jmorris-security/next-testing v5.16-rc5]
[cannot apply to pcmoore-audit/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20211214-084057
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pablo/nf-next.git master
config: openrisc-randconfig-r012-20211213 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211214/202112142134.jipW98iP-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/dcedf3ce1784c565747e19c7917ddbcd3422b821
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20211214-084057
git checkout dcedf3ce1784c565747e19c7917ddbcd3422b821
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c: In function 'ima_lsm_free_rule':
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:360:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'ima_filter_rule_free'; did you mean 'ima_file_free'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
360 | ima_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ima_file_free
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c: In function 'ima_lsm_copy_rule':
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:409:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'ima_filter_rule_init' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
409 | ima_filter_rule_init(nentry->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c: In function 'ima_match_rules':
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:625:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'ima_filter_rule_match' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
625 | rc = ima_filter_rule_match(osid, rule->lsm[i].type,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +360 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
176377d97d6a3f Tyler Hicks 2020-08-11 354
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 355 static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 356 {
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 357 int i;
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 358
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 359 for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
b8867eedcf76ca Tyler Hicks 2020-07-10 @360 ima_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule);
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 361 kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 362 }
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 363 }
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 364
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 365 static void ima_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 366 {
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 367 if (!entry)
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 368 return;
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 369
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 370 /*
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 371 * entry->template->fields may be allocated in ima_parse_rule() but that
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 372 * reference is owned by the corresponding ima_template_desc element in
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 373 * the defined_templates list and cannot be freed here
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 374 */
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 375 kfree(entry->fsname);
176377d97d6a3f Tyler Hicks 2020-08-11 376 ima_free_rule_opt_list(entry->keyrings);
465aee77aae857 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 377 ima_lsm_free_rule(entry);
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 378 kfree(entry);
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 379 }
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 380
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 381 static struct ima_rule_entry *ima_lsm_copy_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 382 {
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 383 struct ima_rule_entry *nentry;
483ec26eed42bf Janne Karhunen 2020-01-15 384 int i;
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 385
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 386 /*
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 387 * Immutable elements are copied over as pointers and data; only
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 388 * lsm rules can change
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 389 */
f60c826d031817 Alex Dewar 2020-09-09 390 nentry = kmemdup(entry, sizeof(*nentry), GFP_KERNEL);
f60c826d031817 Alex Dewar 2020-09-09 391 if (!nentry)
f60c826d031817 Alex Dewar 2020-09-09 392 return NULL;
f60c826d031817 Alex Dewar 2020-09-09 393
c593642c8be046 Pankaj Bharadiya 2019-12-09 394 memset(nentry->lsm, 0, sizeof_field(struct ima_rule_entry, lsm));
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 395
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 396 for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
483ec26eed42bf Janne Karhunen 2020-01-15 397 if (!entry->lsm[i].args_p)
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 398 continue;
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 399
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 400 nentry->lsm[i].type = entry->lsm[i].type;
39e5993d0d452b Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 401 nentry->lsm[i].args_p = entry->lsm[i].args_p;
39e5993d0d452b Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 402 /*
39e5993d0d452b Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 403 * Remove the reference from entry so that the associated
39e5993d0d452b Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 404 * memory will not be freed during a later call to
39e5993d0d452b Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 405 * ima_lsm_free_rule(entry).
39e5993d0d452b Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 406 */
39e5993d0d452b Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 407 entry->lsm[i].args_p = NULL;
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 408
b8867eedcf76ca Tyler Hicks 2020-07-10 @409 ima_filter_rule_init(nentry->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal,
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 410 nentry->lsm[i].args_p,
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 411 &nentry->lsm[i].rule);
483ec26eed42bf Janne Karhunen 2020-01-15 412 if (!nentry->lsm[i].rule)
483ec26eed42bf Janne Karhunen 2020-01-15 413 pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n",
aa0c0227d33171 Tyler Hicks 2020-07-09 414 nentry->lsm[i].args_p);
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 415 }
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 416 return nentry;
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 417 }
b169424551930a Janne Karhunen 2019-06-14 418
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211213234034.111891-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 00/28] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 01/28] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2021-12-14 13:33 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 02/28] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 03/28] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 04/28] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 05/28] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 06/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 07/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 08/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 09/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 10/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 11/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 12/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 13/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-12-15 9:14 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 14/28] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2021-12-14 18:38 ` Christian Göttsche
2021-12-14 18:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 15/28] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 16/28] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 17/28] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 18/28] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 19/28] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 20/28] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 21/28] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 22/28] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 23/28] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 24/28] Audit: Add framework for auxiliary records Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 25/28] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 26/28] Audit: Add record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2021-12-14 13:12 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-14 13:22 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 27/28] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2021-12-13 23:40 ` [PATCH v31 28/28] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202112142134.jipW98iP-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox