Linux-audit Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v37 26/33] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:56:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220628005611.13106-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220628005611.13106-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Replace the single skb pointer in an audit_buffer with
a list of skb pointers. Add the audit_stamp information
to the audit_buffer as there's no guarantee that there
will be an audit_context containing the stamp associated
with the event. At audit_log_end() time create auxiliary
records (none are currently defined) as have been added
to the list. Functions are created to manage the skb list
in the audit_buffer.

Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 kernel/audit.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index e4ee8ee63484..e4cd2cdda7f5 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static struct audit_ctl_mutex {
  * to place it on a transmit queue.  Multiple audit_buffers can be in
  * use simultaneously. */
 struct audit_buffer {
-	struct sk_buff       *skb;	/* formatted skb ready to send */
+	struct sk_buff       *skb;	/* the skb for audit_log functions */
+	struct sk_buff_head  skb_list;	/* formatted skbs, ready to send */
 	struct audit_context *ctx;	/* NULL or associated context */
+	struct audit_stamp   stamp;	/* audit stamp for these records */
 	gfp_t		     gfp_mask;
 };
 
@@ -1765,10 +1767,13 @@ __setup("audit_backlog_limit=", audit_backlog_limit_set);
 
 static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 {
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
 	if (!ab)
 		return;
 
-	kfree_skb(ab->skb);
+	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
+		kfree_skb(skb);
 	kmem_cache_free(audit_buffer_cache, ab);
 }
 
@@ -1784,6 +1789,10 @@ static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
 	ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, gfp_mask);
 	if (!ab->skb)
 		goto err;
+
+	skb_queue_head_init(&ab->skb_list);
+	skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
+
 	if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
 		goto err;
 
@@ -1849,7 +1858,6 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 				     int type)
 {
 	struct audit_buffer *ab;
-	struct audit_stamp stamp;
 
 	if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
 		return NULL;
@@ -1904,14 +1912,14 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &stamp);
+	audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &ab->stamp);
 	/* cancel dummy context to enable supporting records */
 	if (ctx)
 		ctx->dummy = 0;
 	audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%llu.%03lu:%u): ",
-			 (unsigned long long)stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
-			 stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
-			 stamp.serial);
+			 (unsigned long long)ab->stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
+			 ab->stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
+			 ab->stamp.serial);
 
 	return ab;
 }
@@ -2167,6 +2175,57 @@ void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
 		audit_log_format(ab, "(null)");
 }
 
+/**
+ * audit_buffer_aux_new - Add an aux record buffer to the skb list
+ * @ab: audit_buffer
+ * @type: message type
+ *
+ * Aux records are allocated and added to the skb list of
+ * the "main" record. The ab->skb is reset to point to the
+ * aux record on its creation. When the aux record in complete
+ * ab->skb has to be reset to point to the "main" record.
+ * This allows the audit_log_ functions to be ignorant of
+ * which kind of record it is logging to. It also avoids adding
+ * special data for aux records.
+ *
+ * On success ab->skb will point to the new aux record.
+ * Returns 0 on success, -ENOMEM should allocation fail.
+ */
+static int audit_buffer_aux_new(struct audit_buffer *ab, int type)
+{
+	WARN_ON(ab->skb != skb_peek(&ab->skb_list));
+
+	ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, ab->gfp_mask);
+	if (!ab->skb)
+		goto err;
+	if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
+		goto err;
+	skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
+
+	audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%llu.%03lu:%u): ",
+			 (unsigned long long)ab->stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
+			 ab->stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
+			 ab->stamp.serial);
+
+	return 0;
+
+err:
+	kfree_skb(ab->skb);
+	ab->skb = skb_peek(&ab->skb_list);
+	return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+/**
+ * audit_buffer_aux_end - Switch back to the "main" record from an aux record
+ * @ab: audit_buffer
+ *
+ * Restores the "main" audit record to ab->skb.
+ */
+static void audit_buffer_aux_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
+{
+	ab->skb = skb_peek(&ab->skb_list);
+}
+
 int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 {
 	int error;
@@ -2402,26 +2461,14 @@ int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
 }
 
 /**
- * audit_log_end - end one audit record
- * @ab: the audit_buffer
- *
- * We can not do a netlink send inside an irq context because it blocks (last
- * arg, flags, is not set to MSG_DONTWAIT), so the audit buffer is placed on a
- * queue and a kthread is scheduled to remove them from the queue outside the
- * irq context.  May be called in any context.
+ * __audit_log_end - enqueue one audit record
+ * @skb: the buffer to send
  */
-void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
+static void __audit_log_end(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
 
-	if (!ab)
-		return;
-
 	if (audit_rate_check()) {
-		skb = ab->skb;
-		ab->skb = NULL;
-
 		/* setup the netlink header, see the comments in
 		 * kauditd_send_multicast_skb() for length quirks */
 		nlh = nlmsg_hdr(skb);
@@ -2432,6 +2479,26 @@ void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 		wake_up_interruptible(&kauditd_wait);
 	} else
 		audit_log_lost("rate limit exceeded");
+}
+
+/**
+ * audit_log_end - end one audit record
+ * @ab: the audit_buffer
+ *
+ * We can not do a netlink send inside an irq context because it blocks (last
+ * arg, flags, is not set to MSG_DONTWAIT), so the audit buffer is placed on a
+ * queue and a kthread is scheduled to remove them from the queue outside the
+ * irq context.  May be called in any context.
+ */
+void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	if (!ab)
+		return;
+
+	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
+		__audit_log_end(skb);
 
 	audit_buffer_free(ab);
 }
-- 
2.36.1

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220628005611.13106-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-06-28  0:55 ` [PATCH v37 00/33] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 01/33] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 02/33] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 03/33] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 04/33] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 05/33] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 06/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 07/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 08/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 09/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 10/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 11/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 12/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 13/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 14/33] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 15/33] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 16/33] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 17/33] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 18/33] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  5:36     ` kernel test robot
2022-06-28  8:44     ` kernel test robot
2022-06-28 11:24     ` kernel test robot
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 19/33] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 20/33] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:55   ` [PATCH v37 21/33] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 22/33] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 23/33] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 24/33] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 25/33] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 27/33] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 28/33] audit: multiple subject lsm values for netlabel Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 29/33] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 30/33] netlabel: Use a struct lsmblob in audit data Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 31/33] LSM: Removed scaffolding function lsmcontext_init Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 32/33] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28  0:56   ` [PATCH v37 33/33] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2022-07-12 21:42   ` [PATCH v37 00/33] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor John Johansen
2022-07-12 21:58     ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220628005611.13106-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox