From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: signed tarballs Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:43:58 -0400 Message-ID: <2130568.dMp5T6juCr@x2> References: <20170406233134.GA32113@motoko> <20170413202811.GA18419@motoko> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: William Roberts Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Thursday, April 13, 2017 4:30:57 PM EDT William Roberts wrote: > On Apr 13, 2017 13:28, "Christian Rebischke" > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:03:54AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > I added a sha256sum to the release announcement yesterday. You can also > > access the people page via https. > > Thanks, but as I stated before. SHA256 and https doesn't ensure a > non-malicious tarball. Only a signed tarball can achieve this. > > That's not true, he's providing you a detached signature via this > mechanism. You just need to check the sha256sum before extraction. Yeah, MD5 = collisions. SHA-1 = collisions. SHA-2 no known collisions. NIST found during the SHA-3 competition that SHA-2 was much more robust than previously thought. -Steve