From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: "MAUPERTUIS, PHILIPPE" <philippe.maupertuis@equensworldline.com>
Subject: Re: audit-3.0
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:36:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2131118.IeVxGuMqAv@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5F4EE10832231F4F921A255C1D95429807F871@DEERLM99EX7MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Hello Philippe,
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 9:34:08 AM EDT MAUPERTUIS, PHILIPPE wrote:
> On the mailing list a few days ago, it was announce that Audit-3.0 alpha8
> was available. I am a little bit confused because on a RHEL 8 server I get
> :
> rpm -q audit
> audit-3.0-0.10.20180831git0047a6c.el8.x86_64
> What are the link between the Rhel 8 rpm and the version audit-3.0
> announced.
The RHEL 8 rpm is an earlier git snapshot from August 31, 2018 + patches. The
package version should be a clue that this is a git snapshot. The Fedora
packaging guidelines say that if it is a pre-release git snapshot, version
must start with 0 so it can be overridden in the future, and the date + git +
last commit hash must be included so that anyone can identify exactly what
this is.
> I can't imagine RHEL8 using an alpha version.
Why? Anything put into RHEL is carefully tested. (Fedora has also been
running on alpha/git snapshots for about a year, too.) Also, I stopped
feature development in audit-3.0 around August of last year. Everything going
in since then has been bugs reported or discovered or at most small patches
to support new kernel features. So, audit userspace should be considered as
becoming mature, stable code that will not be developed at the same pace as
before.
I expect that when container support lands, there will be a couple rounds of
development to make it nice to use. But then its back to listening for bug
reports.
To be honest, I think at this point anything of value is really higher up the
stack. IOW, visualizing, aggregating, or alerting at scale.
-Steve
> As the side note the Rhel 8 rpm has the following description
> rpm -qi audit
> Name : audit
> Version : 3.0
> Release : 0.10.20180831git0047a6c.el8
> Architecture: x86_64
> Install Date: Mon 17 Jun 2019 05:55:23 PM CEST
> Group : Unspecified
> Size : 678098
> License : GPLv2+
> Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 09 Jan 2019 07:26:49 PM CET, Key ID
> 199e2f91fd431d51 Source RPM :
> audit-3.0-0.10.20180831git0047a6c.el8.src.rpm
> Build Date : Wed 09 Jan 2019 06:26:29 PM CET
> Build Host : x86-vm-06.build.eng.bos.redhat.com
> Relocations : (not relocatable)
> Packager : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla>
> Vendor : Red Hat, Inc.
> URL : http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/
> Summary : User space tools for 2.6 kernel auditing
>
> Of course the kernel for REHL8 is :
> rpm -q kernel
> kernel-4.18.0-80.el8.x86_64
>
> Any clarification is welcome
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-18 13:34 audit-3.0 MAUPERTUIS, PHILIPPE
2019-06-18 14:36 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2019-06-18 15:59 ` EXT :Re: audit-3.0 Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS)
2019-06-18 16:33 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2131118.IeVxGuMqAv@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=philippe.maupertuis@equensworldline.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox