From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Miloslav Trmac <mitr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Questions about --with-alpha and --with-armeb configure flags
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:40:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2472818.UVczZhjD93@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1614990143.37889188.1353950515505.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
On Monday, November 26, 2012 12:21:55 PM Miloslav Trmac wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > > If I understand correctly it's only adding arch detection and syscall
> > > tables to ausyscall. Why are these syscall table conditional?
> >
> > To reduce the number of text relocations in libaudit. Libaudit links
> > against a number of applications and text relocations eats memory and
> > increases startup time.
>
> Is that really an issue with the current code? The gentab.c code was
> designed to avoid text relocations.
I guess not
# relinfo.pl /lib64/libaudit.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libaudit.so.1.0.0: 45 relocations, 35 relative (77%), 60 PLT entries, 2
for local syms (3%), 97 users
# relinfo.pl /home/sgrubb/working/BUILD/audit/lib/.libs/libaudit.so.1.0.0
/home/sgrubb/working/BUILD/audit/lib/.libs/libaudit.so.1.0.0: 45 relocations,
35 relative (77%), 56 PLT entries, 2 for local syms (3%), 0 users
However, it does trim about 14k off libaudit by not compiling these in.
> At least on x86_64 (which, true, is especially well-designed for this),
> there are no text relocations in libaudit nor libauparse, whether
> --with-alpha or --with-armeb are used or not. In fact the number of
> relocations of any kind is exactly the same in both cases.
>
> Any one care to retest this on a different architecture, e.t. 32-bit x86?
>
> FWIW, at least the attached patch was necessary to build with --with-alpha
> --with-armeb.
Applied. Thanks.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-16 17:00 Questions about --with-alpha and --with-armeb configure flags Laurent Bigonville
2012-11-16 18:21 ` Steve Grubb
2012-11-16 19:00 ` Nathaniel Husted
2012-11-26 17:21 ` Miloslav Trmac
2012-11-26 17:40 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2012-11-26 17:50 ` Nathaniel Husted
2012-11-30 13:42 ` Laurent Bigonville
2012-11-30 14:05 ` Steve Grubb
2012-11-30 17:41 ` Laurent Bigonville
2012-11-30 17:44 ` Miloslav Trmac
2012-12-01 14:38 ` Laurent Bigonville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2472818.UVczZhjD93@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=mitr@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox