From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: libaudit large stack requirement in audit_send()
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:35:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2516602.f5OUPAXt9O@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1670639.0hriYILyqT@x2>
On Monday, April 29, 2013 12:48:48 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> I'm open to ideas. I don't know if putting req.nlh.nlmsg_len into a tmp
> variable would help the compiler realise it can reclaim the area occupied
> by req or not. I might be able to get rid of rep2 by reusing the area of
> rep after coping out the important part of it. But this part of the code
> hasn't significantly changed in 7-8 years.
I checked in a change (792) that reduces the stack use by 9008 bytes. Not sure
I can get much more.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-29 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-29 16:15 libaudit large stack requirement in audit_send() Luciano Chavez
2013-04-29 16:48 ` Steve Grubb
2013-04-29 18:35 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2013-04-29 21:02 ` Luciano Chavez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2516602.f5OUPAXt9O@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox