From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] audit: clean up audit queue handling Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:58:01 -0400 Message-ID: <2669469.maGotIEDep@sifl> References: <8462372.4Lu2FckRET@sifl> <20151028184318.GB1359@madcap2.tricolour.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151028184318.GB1359@madcap2.tricolour.ca> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: v.rathor@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 02:43:18 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/10/27, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Thursday, October 22, 2015 02:53:13 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > This set of patches cleans up a number of corner cases in the management > > > of the audit queue. > > > > > > Richard Guy Briggs (7): > > > audit: don't needlessly reset valid wait time > > > audit: include auditd's threads in audit_log_start() wait exception > > > audit: allow systemd to use queue reserves > > > audit: wake up threads if queue switched from limited to unlimited > > > audit: allow audit_cmd_mutex holders to use reserves > > > audit: wake up audit_backlog_wait queue when auditd goes away. > > > audit: wake up kauditd_thread after auditd registers > > > > > > kernel/audit.c | 20 +++++++++++++++----- > > > 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > Due to the fact that these patches were posted late in the 4.3-rcX cycle, > > I've decided not to merge these into linux-audit#next for the upcoming > > merge window. I still need to take a closer look and properly review > > these patches, but I wanted to let you know why I haven't acted on them > > yet. > > No problem, at least it is out of my queue, as long as we have enough > time to hit the next one. :) Definitely. I just start getting twitchy about accepting non-trivial patches post -rc5(ish). -- paul moore security @ redhat