From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: rgb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: audit_status in kernel
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:25:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27892229.0ex1XAQCcX@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2266202.J6IrG6ma9a@x2>
On Monday, March 10, 2014 05:48:06 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was looking at a new kernel and see that the audit_status structure has
> changed. The first member of the structure is a bit mask that tells what all
> is in the structure. So, if we add this:
>
> __u32 version; /* audit api version number */
> __u32 backlog_wait_time;/* message queue wait timeout */
> };
>
> Then we need to have a define for those two:
>
> #define AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT 0x0010
> +#define AUDIT_STATTUS_VERSION 0x0020
> -#define AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_WAIT_TIME 0x0020
> +#define AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_WAIT_TIME 0x0040
>
> IOW, each entry in the structure is supposed to have a mask value.
Actually, I think the problems are worse. We have the issue of an expanding
data structure over time as new things get added. But yet we have a fixed sized
audit_status structure. I could copy that into the audit package's source code
so that I have the new structure definition. But I will have to do the same
thing each time. Also, how would an old kernel tolerate a bigger audit_status
structure being sent with AUDIT_SET commands by a new auditctl?
What we should do is leave AUDIT_GET the way it was. We should then define
AUDIT_GET_EXT and then use it a lot like audit_rule_data which has
struct audit_status_ext {
__u32 field_count;
__u32 fields[AUDIT_MAX_FIELDS];
__u32 values[AUDIT_MAX_FIELDS];
};
Then insert the field identifier in fields and the value in the other. This way
the format is defined once and we can reuse it for a long time.
>From user space, the migration would be easy. Old auditctl still uses
AUDIT_GET. New auditctl would try AUDIT_GET_EXT and if that's not recognized,
drop back to AUDIT_GET. Then one day down the road we remove AUDIT_GET in the
kernel.
This is how we did the migration from AUDIT_RULES to AUDIT_RULES_DATA.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-10 21:48 audit_status in kernel Steve Grubb
2014-03-10 22:25 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2014-03-10 23:14 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27892229.0ex1XAQCcX@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox