From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: Questions about --with-alpha and --with-armeb configure flags Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:05:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3510905.8bHYXYgT9k@x2> References: <1624466.CLzrYpMLkX@x2> <1614990143.37889188.1353950515505.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <20121130144227.79c66ed0@fornost.bigon.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121130144227.79c66ed0@fornost.bigon.be> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Laurent Bigonville Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, Miloslav Trmac List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Friday, November 30, 2012 02:42:27 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:21:55 -0500 (EST), > = > Miloslav Trmac a =E9crit : > > FWIW, at least the attached patch was necessary to build with > > --with-alpha --with-armeb. Mirek > = > I unfortunately still have a failure in the checks with both svn HEAD > and 2.2.1 when passing --with-armeb > = > Unexpected match `a1' > FAIL: lookup_test > = > An idea? Thanks for reporting this. Its fixed in trunk now. -Steve