From: Kangkook Jee <aixer77@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Early processes (daemons) do not report audit events
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:08:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <352E5622-8611-4A05-9CA5-36DB38E36C66@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150913155826.GR8140@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7172 bytes --]
Dear Richard,
Thanks a lot for your help. I agree that the inconsistency seems a bit strange but
I also doubt that different distributions make different changes to kernel/audit.c. This
may be just a timing issue with regard to startup orderings.
I’d like to append Burn’s message that solved my issue for future reference.
>>>
>>> Kangkook,
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can re-test, but modify the kernel boot parameters to
>>> include audit=1 as an additional argument.
>>>
>>> Reading the auditd(8) manual, one sees
>>>
>>> A boot param of audit=1 should be added to ensure that all
>>> processes that run before the audit daemon starts is marked as
>>> auditable by the kernel. Not doing that will make a few
>>> processes impossible to properly audit.
Thanks again for your help!
Regards, Kangkook
> On Sep 13, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com <mailto:rgb@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 15/09/11, Kangkook Jee wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>
> Hi Kangkook,
>
>> I also did the same experiment for the latest distributions of Fedora
>> core and Debian and here’s the results.
>>
>> Fedora-22 (64-bit, 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64): Problem reproduced.
>> Debian-8 (64-bit, 3.16.0-4-amd64): Problem reproduced
>>
>> Btw, Burn Alting (burn@swtf.dyndns.org <mailto:burn@swtf.dyndns.org>) suggested me to append audit=1
>> to kernel flag. I added the option to boot-loader (grub) and problem
>> went away.
>
> On all systems? This is expected behaviour. Sorry I was not more
> explicit in asking you to test that. I guess it was implied by asking
> what the settings for the kernel command line were.
>
> Now the surprising bit is that CentOS does not demonstrate the problem
> without audit=1 in the command line, which leads me to wonder if they
> have set "u32 audit_enabled = 1;" around line 83 of
> kernel/audit.c in their kernel source. It would surprise me if they
> did, but it would not be completely unreasonable.
>
>> Regards, Kangkook
>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2015, at 12:24 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com <mailto:rgb@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>> On 15/09/11, Kangkook Jee wrote:
>>>> From the previous reply, I think I misunderstood your question regarding kernel command line.
>>>> Here’s "cat /proc/cmdline” results for distributions that I’ve experimented.
>>>>
>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 (64-bit):
>>>> BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-58-generic root=UUID=7505f862-ce46-49e5-9d1c-e4e307844889 ro text quiet splash vt.handoff=7
>>>>
>>>> Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit):
>>>> BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-32-generic root=UUID=5be789be-9b0c-463e-bd18-42bfa79fb24c ro quiet splash
>>>>
>>>> CentOS 7 (64-bit):
>>>> BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/centos-root ro rd.lvm.lv=centos/root rd.lvm.lv=centos/swap crashkernel=auto rhgb quiet LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>>>>
>>>> CentOS 6 (64-bit):
>>>> ro root=UUID=a7d44560-adcc-4000-9584-8b9fcf2afd74 rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_LVM LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_NO_MD SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 crashkernel=129M@0M KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us rd_NO_DM rhgb quiet
>>>>
>>>> I don’t see any audit=<value> entries from all examples above.
>>>
>>> Yes, this is what I was seeking from you. And you are correct, none of
>>> them have audit=1 as I was hoping from at least CentOS. There is a
>>> chance that the CentOS kernel was compiled with audit=1 hardcoded, but I
>>> think that is a pretty small chance...
>>>
>>> I'll have to look at this closer... But any Debian and Fedora data
>>> points that you can provide would certainly be useful.
>>>
>>>> /Kangkook
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 11, 2015, at 5:50 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com <mailto:rgb@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15/09/10, Kangkook Jee wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I debugged a bit further to identify distributions that are affected by the issue.
>>>>>> I repeated the same experiment with sshd from 3 more distributions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (64-bit, 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64): Problem NOT reproduced
>>>>>> CentOS release 6.6 (64-bit, 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64): Problem NOT reproduced
>>>>>> Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS (64-bit, 3.13.0-32-generic): Problem reproduced
>>>>>
>>>>> For each of these examples, what is the value of the kernel command line
>>>>> "audit=<value>" if it is even present? It is possible that the CentOS
>>>>> examples include "audit=1" while Ubuntu omits the line. "cat
>>>>> /proc/cmdline" should tell you the answer.
>>>>>
>>>>>> After all, Ubuntu family are affected by the issue and I could confirm
>>>>>> that results are inconsistent across two different distribution
>>>>>> families.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would be curious what your results are with a recent Debian and with a
>>>>> recent Fedora.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can let us know how can we workaround the issue, it will be a great help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Kangkook
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:50 PM, Kangkook Jee <aixer77@gmail.com <mailto:aixer77@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are developing custom user space audit agent to gather system wide system
>>>>>>> call trace. While experimenting with various programs, we found out that
>>>>>>> processes (daemons) that started early (along with the system bootstrapping) do
>>>>>>> not report any audit events at all. These processes typically fall into PID
>>>>>>> range of less than 2000. Here’s how I reproduced the symptom with sshd daemon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Reboot the system
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. Add and enable audit events
>>>>>>> # /sbin/auditctl -a exit,always -F arch=b64 -S clone -S close -S creat -S dup
>>>>>>> -S dup2 -S dup3 -S execve -S exit -S exit_group -S fork -S open -S openat
>>>>>>> -S unlink -S unlinkat -S vfork -S 288 -S accept -S bind -S connect
>>>>>>> -S listen -S socket -S socketpair
>>>>>>> # /sbin/auditctl -e1 -b 102400
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. Connect to the system via ssh
>>>>>>> Audit messages generated only from child processes and none are seen from
>>>>>>> the original daemon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. Restart sshd
>>>>>>> # restart ssh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5. Connect again to the system via ssh
>>>>>>> Now, we see audit messages from both parent and child processes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did the experiment from Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS distribution (64-bit, kernel
>>>>>>> version 3.13.0-58-generic).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I first wonder whether this is intended behavior of audit framework or
>>>>>>> not. If it is intended, I also want to know how can we configure auditd
>>>>>>> differently to capture system calls from all processes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your help in advance!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards, Kangkook
>>>>>
>>>>> - RGB
>>>
>>> - RGB
>
> - RGB
>
> --
> Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com <mailto:rbriggs@redhat.com>>
> Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
> Remote, Ottawa, Canada
> Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 25300 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-16 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-10 3:50 Early processes (daemons) do not report audit events Kangkook Jee
2015-09-10 20:53 ` Kangkook Jee
2015-09-11 9:50 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-09-11 11:03 ` Kangkook Jee
2015-09-11 11:45 ` Kangkook Jee
2015-09-11 16:24 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-09-11 20:17 ` Kangkook Jee
2015-09-13 15:58 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-09-16 13:08 ` Kangkook Jee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=352E5622-8611-4A05-9CA5-36DB38E36C66@gmail.com \
--to=aixer77@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox