From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed reason field in audit signal logging Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:11:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3543583.YTj3YxNvnl@x2> References: <20131107133932.GA10317@pauldc-Inspiron-1470> <1584071.15NUDX4DRn@x2> <1383838941.2938.40.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1383838941.2938.40.camel@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Eric Paris Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:42:21 AM Eric Paris wrote: > > I am confused. This is the abnormal end event I have: > > > > > > type=ANOM_ABEND msg=audit(1303339663.307:142): auid=4325 uid=0 gid=0 > > ses=1 > > subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 pid=3775 comm="aureport" > > sig=11> > > > > > > Why / when did we start adding text explanations? We should not do that. > > We didn't have it before and it should not have been added. The signal > > number is enough to identify the problem. > > We started adding a reason when seccomp started sending ANOM_ABEND > events as well. It doesn't do so with a signal. Agreed, the " " is/was > a bad idea... Does seccomp still send these? I see there is an AUDIT_SECCOMP event being sent by __audit_seccomp(). Does seccomp do anything with ABEND at this point? -Steve