From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] audit: Implement audit_log_tty()
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 15:46:49 -0400
Message-ID: <38d49beb-a5dd-29de-3e4b-3dde67fdc28d@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20180524201105.3179904-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20180524201105.3179904-4-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <CAHC9VhRjYhSgd_YCmgaOU_MEKuNKbHvPCVotmxyZRzSc2E6-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhRjYhSgd_YCmgaOU_MEKuNKbHvPCVotmxyZRzSc2E6-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-MW
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sgrubb@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On 05/29/2018 05:07 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Berger
> <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> +void audit_log_tty(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct task_struct *tsk)
>> +{
>> +       struct tty_struct *tty = audit_get_tty(tsk);
>> +
>> +       audit_log_format(ab, " tty=%s", tty ? tty_name(tty) : "(none)");
>> +       audit_put_tty(tty);
>> +}
> Perhaps I missed it, but your IMA patches only ever call this to log
> current's tty, yes?  If so, I would prefer if we dropped the
> task_struct argument and always had audit_log_tty() use current.

Done.


>