From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Loulwa Salem <loulwas@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with audit
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:26:52 -0500
Message-ID: <444818BC.3060807@us.ibm.com>
References: <444813FD.9060507@us.ibm.com>
	<200604201912.40649.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200604201912.40649.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Steve Grubb wrote:

> How does lspp.18 do? It seems more stable to me than lspp.17. Also, what SE 
> Linux policy do you have loaded ?

I am running SELinux in permissive mode.
I tried the lspp.18 kernel and I still see the same problem.

- Loulwa