From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linda Knippers Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPC_SET_PERM cleanup Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:22:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4462213B.7000706@hp.com> References: <445BB351.2040303@hp.com> <20060509203608.GF31457@w-m-p.com> <4460FFA6.4070506@hp.com> <200605101002.31857.sgrubb@redhat.com> <20060510162902.GG31457@w-m-p.com> <20060510171150.GH31457@w-m-p.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4AHLo0j025437 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:21:50 -0400 Received: from atlrel7.hp.com (atlrel7.hp.com [156.153.255.213]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4AHLipq025136 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:21:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060510171150.GH31457@w-m-p.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Klaus Weidner Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com > I'm not sure that's really necessary, the type=IPC_SET_PERM already tells > you that these are new values. How about simply the following: > > type=IPC_SET_PERM msg=audit(1146863632.117:98): qbytes=0 iuid=501 igid=0 mode=0 Would you use ouid and ogid in the IPC record? Do we need mode in the IPC record? We have it in the PATH records. -- ljk