From: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Multiple Rule Logic
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:13:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <446A326C.1070600@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Hey Steve,
I was wondering what is to be expected when multiple rules exist that
pertain to the same action.
Examples:
entry,always -S chmod - should see a record for chmod
exclude,always -S all - should never see any sys calls
Combined, should I expect a chmod record?
From my experiments with the current code, if any one rule instructs
audit to log the action, auditd will log it (i.e. I'll see a chmod
record). I'm wondering if this is the intended functionality.
Thanks,
Mike
next reply other threads:[~2006-05-16 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-16 20:13 Michael C Thompson [this message]
2006-05-16 21:46 ` Multiple Rule Logic Steve Grubb
2006-05-17 15:30 ` Michael C Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=446A326C.1070600@us.ibm.com \
--to=thompsmc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox