From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: auditctl usage for filter lists: "user" , "watch" and "exclude"
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:04:37 -0500
Message-ID: <446C9B15.1030306@us.ibm.com>
References: <446C8915.20606@us.ibm.com> <446C8BCC.1020002@us.ibm.com>
	<446C95BF.2020902@us.ibm.com>
	<200605181158.43975.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200605181158.43975.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 11:41, Michael C Thompson wrote:
>> It also seems to be that:
>>
>> auditctl -a exclude,always -F msgtype=CWD
>> auditctl -a exclude,always -F msgtype=PATH
>>
>> and
>>
>> auditctl -a exclude,always -F msgtype=CWD -F msgtype=PATH
>>
>> do not work in the same way, 
> 
> This is true. The ones on the same line form an "and" expression. The ones on 
> different lines form an "or" expression.

So then it should be safe to say that having two -F msgtype=... is an 
invalid construct for a rule? Since messages have only 1 type?

Mike